Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.D. Liano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

A.D. Liano

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional autobiography. PROD contested. Subject has some but limited notability but it is probably not enough to trump the COI issues here. The author has also made promotional articles about his own films at Barberland and Everything Strange and New. DanielRigal. (talk) 00:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now I suppose as the awards suggest something but there may not be enough for a particularly better article at this time so draft and userfy if needed. Pinging past users and  and also interested users,  and .  SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: article is promotional and subject is insufficiently notable. Quis separabit?  06:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficiently notable as yet. Being nominated is not winning.  DGG ( talk ) 06:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Subject simply hasn't received significant coverage. Userfy for now. Blackguard  07:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable director/producer, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 09:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete If he had several rather than just the one shared Gotham Awards nomination, I might argue for a keep under WP:ANYBIO, and if he had a few more sources speaking about him rather than these four, I might feel inclined to keep under WP:GNG, and if his films had enough coverage to meet WP:NF, I might argue a keep under WP:FILMMAKER. If the situation ever improves, we can always resurrect the article.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 16:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable director/producer, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. &mdash;Skyllfully (talk &#124; contribs) 09:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * - Couldn't you be a bit more creative & come up with something yourself instead of copy-pasting my entire !vote ? . – Davey 2010 Talk 12:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: I know understand policies and makes total sense. I've moved my bio to a user page. Have to say -- my first experience w/ wiki is pretty awesome and the technology behind the auto gen flags is amazing. Please delete. Thanks. Adliano (talk) 20:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.