Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.G.A.S.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Xy7  (talk)  00:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

A.G.A.S.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

spam article containing fake inline citations previously tagged for speedy but, speedy tag removed without explaination by anon user. Instead of speedy tagging again or risking PROD tag removal I figured best to bring it straight here for consensus. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, lack of reliable sources. Would support G11 due to the extremely spammy language.  However, I think calling the citations "fake" is going a little far.  Perhaps we can assume good faith and say that the creator, new to Wikipedia, doesn't understand how footnotes are typically used. gnfnrf (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is very confusing, doesn't seem to be all that notable, and the footnotes are bogus. Someone should inform the creator of the article how footnotes are usually used. Tempodivalse (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.