Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.S. Williams

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was userfy to User:Aswilliams. Sjakkalle (Check!)  1 July 2005 10:03 (UTC)

A.S. Williams
Vanity, seems non-notable, although it seems encylopedic, so I'm slightly sympathetic to it. People voting here might want to look at Vindibudd. -- Natalinasmpf 03:58, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. This appears to be a vanity page, as it was created by User:Aswilliams. NatusRoma 04:16, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy to User:Aswilliams --Xcali 04:38, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 07:36, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete more vanity. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:13, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Autobiography. No evidence that the WP:BIO criteria are satisfied.  Since this user has made other contributions to Wikipedia, Userfy. Uncle G 11:53, 2005 Jun 20 (UTC)
 * Userfy to User:Aswilliams See my comments above for Vindibudd. Volatile 18:05, 2005 Jun 20 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Uncle G.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 20:51, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * userfy this please Yuckfoo 23:44, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy. - Mgm|(talk) 08:04, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here that can't go in Vindibudd, if Vindibudd is kept. Gamaliel 08:06, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * As the author of Vindibudd appears to now be disinterested in fighting on, may I concur with Volatile: Userfy, since as far as I know, no-one is suggesting he isn't a valid user. --Simon Cursitor 12:42, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy nn but fine for userspace. You (Talk) 00:46, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.