Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Film L.A., Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

A. Film L.A., Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Creator is username blocked at the moment, possible COI. Created two pages, this one and the company's creator, Hans Perk. A google news search reveals nothing obvious on the first page, using a number of name permutations. Nothing in the article to indicate notability or reference it either. Shadowjams (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 03:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no evidence of the subject's notability. Delete per nom. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  08:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only claims are on the afilmla.com website, which trace back to the Denmark company. Perhaps this is a US office of the main firm? In any case, it hardly warrants mention on A. Film A/S, let alone a page of its own. tedder (talk) 03:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to A. Film A/S. (One may wonder whether that target is notable, but that is another discussion that should be held on its own merits.) On its website, A. Film L.A., Inc. identifies itself as "the U.S. subsidiary of A. Film A/S, Denmark" – which on its website lists the L.A. company under "offices". Presumably, it is a legal entity established under California law that is largely or wholly owned by the Danish A. Film A/S. This news item calls it a "permanent U.S. presence" of A. Film. All together there is not enough for an article that can stand on its own. --Lambiam 21:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think we should redirect if there is no mention of the redirect in the target article. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  17:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.