Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Ghastlee Ghoul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America1000 02:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

A. Ghastlee Ghoul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN local public-access TV host. Unable to find decent RS to satisfy GNG - lots of self-published fan-sites and a few plugs saying he'll appear somewhere. Failed CSD with rationale that being on public-access TV makes you important if you're there long enough. The Dissident Aggressor 02:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete. He was one of the 60 or so horror hosts covered in the 2009 documentary American Scary, along with a handful of other successors to Cleveland's Ghoulardi.  . HighBeam yields some light coverage in local media in Dayton.  So he's not completely without reliable sources, but not enough to warrant an article.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Someone who's hosted the same TV show for several years may well have gotten a decent amount of coverage, especially because the time period enables us to have secondary sources, rather than just primary sources like news articles about the guy's current activities. I declined the speedy deletion because we ought to have a chance to discuss whether they exist or, as demonstrated here, that they don't.  Nyttend (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:53, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.