Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Ricardo Sant'ana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 21:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

A. Ricardo Sant&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

PROD challenged by creator. He is a non-notable mid-level leader in the LDS Church. He is an "area seventy", which is not even a full-time ecclesiastical position. They work on a volunteer part-time basis; there are a few hundred in the world, and they get rotated every 5 years or so (i.e. it is not a life-tenured position). I would venture to say he's not even notable within the LDS Church. Currently, the only references in this article are to publications that are published by an entity that the church owns. (The Church News is published by Deseret Morning News, which is owned by the LDS Church.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete as per Notability (people). Fails all criteria - Ravichandar My coffee shop 05:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence in the article of notability, and no evidence to be found after searching. So definitely seems to be not notable. Austin46 (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article does not cite independent reliable sources and as such does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 21:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Alexf42 15:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per precedent, but not a speedy., (I think the key factor in their lack of notability is that the leadership role is volunteer and part time, not that there are several hundred; there are, after all several hundred congressmen--and that's not a life time position either.)DGG (talk) 16:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.