Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Sea Herndon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Stuckism in America. Tone 21:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

A. Sea Herndon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

After a few days nothing has come to this article and, it must be said, expectedly so: this is the Google search. We are dealing with a non-notable author who has generated no press but has written two books--both of which published by an on-demand press, CreateSpace. Delete. Drmies (talk) 03:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am unable to find significant coverage for this individual (or, for that matter, his book). - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  —Vejvančický (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of reliable and independent sources. The subject fails the notability criteria for authors. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. –  Ty  10:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Stuckist artists [see below for better redirect] . WP:N requires coverage by multiple secondary sources (see WP:RS) to justify a stand-alone article. These have not been shown to exist, and others as above have been unable to find them; nor have I. The main validation by an outside source seems to be his place in the Stuckism movement.  Ty  10:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that this "main validation" was added after the Wikipedia article was created, and is partially in response to it. -Frazzydee|&#9997; 17:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. The article was started four days ago, but the link I gave is to a post in December 2006, so it can't be a response to the article.  Ty  19:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You are right, sorry. -Frazzydee|&#9997; 21:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * There's a link in the web archive from the Stuckism International site for March 2007 which shows him as a member of the movement.  Ty  21:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * He remains on the current site. A google search for "Tulsa Stuckists" only reveals that page, and Wikipedia. -Frazzydee|&#9997; 21:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: His name has been added to a number of pages after the article was created. If it is decided that the author is non-notable and the page should be deleted, some other edits should be re-considered for similar reasons.  I will continue to update this list as the need arises. -Frazzydee|&#9997; 05:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * University of Tulsa (diff)
 * Art manifesto (diff)
 * Stuckism (diff)
 * Stuckism in the United States (diff) (prior to the paragraphs being added, redlinks were added and later reverted, see diff. It appears that Herndon's name has been there for some time, and I see no reason against keeping it there (but not as a redlink), unless perhaps the Tulsa Stuckists is now defunct (the website doesn't appear to be accessible))
 * —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frazzydee (talk • contribs)
 * I've trimmed the content in those articles (apart from the University). Article content per WP:NNC has a different standard to a stand-alone article. Best to take any further issues to the relevant article talk page.  Ty  13:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In light of the above, a better redirect would be to Stuckism in America.  Ty  13:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.