Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A00 Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 e5

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE. dbenbenn | talk 13:24, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The votes were 5 merge, 2 delete.

A00 Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 e5

 * I honestly don't even know what this is supposed to be. I found this while looking at Sokolsky Opening (the only page the article is linked to). It looks like a game of chess using the Sokolsky Opening, which is not a very encyclopaedic thing itself. So unless anyone can say that this article has a deeper meaning than just being a game of chess, I'll vote delete. --Conti|&#9993; 10:38, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)


 * Maybe merge to Sokolsky Opening. It shows a few lines of the opening. It would be nice if somebody added comments and annotation between the raw notation.--Sonjaaa 10:50, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete more chesscruft. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:08, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge useful content into Sokolsky Opening and be sure to format it. Mgm|(talk) 13:17, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge. It's the analysis of the opening, not a game. But beware of original research: see Talk:A00 Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 e5! If this turns out not to be the standard ECO analysis, then delete as original research. Lupo 14:04, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * ...and if it is taken from ECO, it should probably be deleted for copyright reasons (chess games cannot be copyrighted, but analysis can be). --Camembert 14:15, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The wording of the analysis has copyright protection, the substance of the analysis does not. --Jerzy(t) 01:44, 2005 Jan 23 (UTC)
 * Oh, really? Fair enough. --Camembert 01:06, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useable to Sokolsky Opening. Megan1967 01:35, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful to Sokolsky Opening. Andris 01:08, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.