Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A1 (code)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 08:50, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

A1 (code)
Dictionary def (from FOLDOC) but has no context and makes no sense (i.e. not even a good dictionary definition). It's been in existence for a couple of months without significant improvement. Someone added an example but that seems to be a trivial example and not particularly enlightening (with 2 red links). RJFJR 03:47, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. No real info. I see no example. -- RHaworth 06:02, 2005 Feb 5 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Important information for Wikipedia, personally i didn't know about it. Beta_M talk, |contrib ( &Euml;-Mail )
 * Delete unless context can be found. Does not currently make any sense. jni 14:28, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * The definition is tautologous. The only external hyperlink is broken.  And "A1 code" fails both the Google Web and (more importantly, given the purported topic) the Google Groups tests, all hits being either Wikipedia mirrors, FOLDOC mirrors, or other submit-it-yourself listings where this very same entry has been submitted.  "Important information" my eye.  Delete. Uncle G 16:14, 2005 Feb 5 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not sure how this info would be useful. Carrp | Talk 20:19, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unhelpful fragment, article explains nothing. Wyss 22:11, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:26, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)