Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A4133 road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep per the rambling and entertaining conversation below. —Cleared as filed. 00:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

A4133 road
Another non-notable road, in my opinion. Orphaned page. Kareeser|Talk! 20:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, A-road. Kappa 20:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, we have plenty of B road articles, A roads ought to be a no brainer. Jcuk 22:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * We don't have lots of B road articles - most have been merged into List of B roads in Great Britain . I agree that major A roads should be included, but I wonder if ones as small as this wouldn't be better merged into a A roads in Great Britain? — sjorford (talk)  11:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, a per above. Englishrose 23:20, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. We clearly need all of these if we want to be an encyclopedia. -- JJay 00:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * We do? Well I guess Brittanica's been doing it all wrong then. D e nni &#9775;  02:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You bet they have. That's why we left them in the dust a long time ago. -- JJay 02:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Quantity does not equal quality. More is not always better. The only dust we've left Brittanica in is the dust of sheer numbers. That's not too hard to do if you're going to keep ratty little articles on every road, school, and railway station in the known universe. The Nature study shows Brittanica still has the edge in accuracy, and since this is an encyclopedia, that's the one that counts to me. D e nni &#9775;  03:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Although quantity does it for me, I agree that your links are fairly high quality. And you should know it's not the size that counts... -- JJay 03:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Give your head a shake, boy. If you see an article which reads in its entirety "Edina High School is a public High School in Edina, Minnesota" as "fairly high quality", then you really have no business editing here. D e nni &#9775;  01:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I see you are as cheerful and positive as always. Must be the Canadian winter. -- JJay 01:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You got right on that school article, I see. Yes, shame is a powerful motivator! D e nni &#9775;  00:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Shame? More my concern for you. I couldn't bear the thought of you rushing home from school everyday on those icy Canadian roads to see if the Edina school article had been expanded. -- JJay 01:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Essexmutant 09:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete line on a map belongs on an atlas, not in an encyclopaedia. --TimPope 22:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.