Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABC Language


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete --Tone 14:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

ABC Language

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:Neologism and original research. No coverage in third-party reliable sources. Article was PRODed but declined. Sheep NotGoats  (Talk) 18:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Three guys named c0n, Guvna and Tony apparently talk like this. Someone thought that we would care.  We don't. Mandsford (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This is real language used by real people, hence why the language was documented. It's important to point out the original users and inventors of the language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ABC Language (talk • contribs) 18:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)  — ABC Language (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Wikipedia is not a publisher of first instance. Please read our No original research policy, and get the language that you have just made up documented in depth by multiple independent and reliable sources outside of Wikipedia, first. This project is not a free web host for documenting the heretofore undocumented. Uncle G (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT Jclemens (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable per the various policies cited above in nom & Jclemens. A Google search throws up many hits for other uses of "ABC Language", but not this one. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * A Google search is not a valid point for an argument. Google is a search engine, not an encyclopedia. In this case ABC Language is related to an urban street language that is unknown to some, but used a lot by others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABC Language (talk • contribs) 2008-11-05 20:50:36
 * Let me guess, unsigned comment from the article author. Yes, Google is a search engine, and it's a good start for verifying whether something is notable enough that it has been mentioned elsewhere.  A lack of confirmation is a valid point to raise; on the other hand, if you can use a search engine to find verifiable sources that refer to ABC language, then that's a valid point in your favor. Mandsford (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Reyk  YO!  23:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. c0n, Guvna and Tony Brown (aged 14) made up some silly words one day. Big deal. 86.133.242.139 (talk) 14:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.