Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABDL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect. humblefool&reg;Deletion Reform 00:51, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

ABDL
I made effort to make this NPOV, but it's a how-to/FAQ. There is no content here that is not also in Infantilism. Please look at the talk page for examples of the material I've moved off the main page. brenneman (t) (c) 04:54, 18 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Infantilism Tom k&e 15:32, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. &mdash; RJH 15:33, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, no merge is nessesary or desired. func (talk) 17:25, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * do not delete I think it offers a look at a community rather than a clinical survey as offered in the infantilsm page. Dave
 * do not delete The seperation of the two articles allows one to have a clinical veiw while the other has a multiple point of veiw. I would also like to note that the ABDL article has sections dealing in more practical matters, something that infantilism does not. There were complaints about how the Infantilism article was writen before and there was some agreement that the seperation of the articles would cut down on article size and keep the point of veiw consistant for both articles. (EDIT: Signed for the sake of others) -- OrbitOne
 * (Unsigned edit by 80.62.170.94 - brenneman (t) (c)  11:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC) )


 * do not delete Though addressing the same general topic, the two articles address it from two very different places. Like the above voter said, Infantilism is more of a clinical exploration and ABDL is more from the point of view of people practicing it.  If there is to be a re-direct, it should be merged instead of just deleted.  But seeing as they originated as one article before being split due to article length, re-merging them wouldn't make much sense.
 * (Unsigned edit by Icarus3 - brenneman (t) (c)  11:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC) )


 * do not delete This is an article on a community, while Infantilism is an article on the fetish that this community shares - related yes, but not at all the same thing. - Pacula 03:48, 31 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.