Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABS Computer Technologies (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Newegg. ✗ plicit  07:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

ABS Computer Technologies
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG, no evidence of notability, virtually no content. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Restore redirect to Newegg per previous AfD decision: I don't see enough in the announcement press-release or available product reviews to justify a distinct article on this relaunched brand. Possibly, some mention of it should be added to the Newegg history. AllyD (talk) 07:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Restore redirect to Newegg per previous AfD decision. Articuno appears (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Restore redirect to Newegg per previous AfD decision. Anton.bersh (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. (I did a search of the company on Google Scholar). JayzBox (talk) 07:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Please Keep, I did some research before I started the edit, most of the products got lot of reviews on Newegg, 80 reviews for a new released RTX 3090, even more then NZXT, CyberPowerPC. Ryandhnew (talk) 05:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The "80 reviews" you linked to is just a count of how many people voted in a 5-star ranking poll for a particular product. This is not proper coverage (neither for the subject of this article, the company, nor for the product). Also, if you are looking to buy something, Wikipedia is not a place for buyer's guides or lists. There are better sites for that (gaming magazines, price trackers, benchmark sites, etc.) Anton.bersh (talk) 08:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , user reviews are not reliable published coverage. This is all the more so when they are published on the product vendor's own site. AllyD (talk) 10:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.