Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACK!MUD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 20:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

ACK!MUD
vanity, non-notable, fails Google test wikipediatrix 14:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above, also article is poorly written (as a side note ;-)). Dbertman 14:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * ACK! Delete! per nom. --Coredesat 20:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A MUD interface that apparently sees a fair amount of use and discussion. Try your Google again using "Ackmud".  Also, just because one of the coders made an edit or two doesn't make the article vanity.  It could use some cleanup, though.  --UsaSatsui 05:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. poorly written and sources are vacuous. if there is anything useful here it could be merged into MUD. note all the other "MUD"s are either redlinks or incorrectly linked to an extraneous subject. Joan-of-arc 19:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.