Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACM Air Charter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Soft delete. KTC (talk) 19:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

ACM Air Charter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This corporate charter/aircraft lease company fails WP:CORP. The article is based solely on one self-published website, and a google search does not reveal anything that would establish the significant third-party coverage that is needed according to that notability guideline. A search at the Flightglobal Archive does not produce anything, either. I have to admit that I wrote a good part of that article myself in 2010, using my (then valid) account. Back then, I obviously was not that familiar with the Wikipedia policies and guidelines, otherwise I would have long since AfD'ed it. FoxyOrange (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. FoxyOrange (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. FoxyOrange (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. FoxyOrange (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * edit one more reference --Gelli63 (talk) 18:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Dear Gelli63, your additional reference is just a directory-like entry at the airport website. This is not the significant coverage needed to pass WP:CORP.--FoxyOrange (talk) 18:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  01:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * approved by the Luftfahrt-Bundesamt --Gelli63 (talk) 20:53, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Again, airlines are not inherently notable. The relevant inclusion criteria are listed at WP:CORP. In case of ACM Air Charter, they do not seem to be met; merely being a "registered company" does not suffice.--FoxyOrange (talk) 12:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.