Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADANCO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:52, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

ADANCO

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references are limited to publications by the creators of the software. While highly cited, these papers do not contribute to the program's notability since they only discuss it tangentially and some do not mention the program at all. It would appear that the techniques the authors developed are notable, but the commercial application they created is not per WP:NOTINHERITED. Since I found no substantial coverage of ADANCO in reliable secondary sources, I believe it clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. Rentier (talk) 21:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable. Dbsseven (talk) 22:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears to be that topic has not received significant coverage -nor any coverage for that matter- in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so it is presumed to be not suitable for a stand-alone article or list. Thinker78 (talk) 06:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.