Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADD-Anonymous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

ADD-Anonymous

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason: Does not meet notability requirements in WP:ORG -- Craigtalbert 00:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - A Search for news articles on ADD Anonymous HighBeam gives no results, only two Google News Archive (neither of which are about the organization, but just list it in a directory) , a similar kind of reference appears in Google Book Search ,    nothing on Google Scholar .     Delete unless references can be produced.
 * Delete per nom... needs references. I can't really find much useful information on their webpage about how many meetings are, where they are, or if there even are any active meetings. --W.marsh 00:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - judging by the number of references I can find to it, there's no way this article can be verifiable. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  00:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing to suggest this organisation is notable. And I doubt many notable organisations have their official site at members.aol.com. WjBscribe 00:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable. A simple reference search provides very little that can be called credible.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 06:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. To attain a keep, article needs to include an explanation of why the topic is notable, and to include enough independent reliable sources (not the organization's own web site etc.) that discuss or at least mention it to support an article. Best, --Shirahadasha 07:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Article does not assert notability, thus CSD A7 applies. JulesH 13:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Topic is not notable - • The Giant Puffin •  13:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not established --Mhking 16:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I am in agreement with Shirahadasha's opinion. The article must justify its notability to be kept. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 18:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are lacking and I find very little credible sources when looking for Google.-- Pre ston  H (Sandbox) •  (Sign Here!) 19:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Fails WP:ORG. Ronbo76 22:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.