Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADG CLASS 5 Oxidizers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Lear's Fool 07:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

ADG CLASS 5 Oxidizers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage in secondary sources makes this obscure section of an obscure Australian standard non-notable. The article is just a summary of the regulation, not an encyclopedia. This article appears to have been created as part of a university project; see this discussion on the Australian Wikipedians' notice board for related articles. bou·le·var·dier (talk) 06:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —bou·le·var·dier (talk) 06:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Delete Unencyclopedic compliance guide. Nothing that seems to pass GNG. Nothing significantly salvageable.  Lord Vetinari  07:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:N and fails WP:NOTHOWTO. Nick-D (talk) 08:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Basically per everyone above. Out of interest, did anyone end up getting in contact with whoever's running this project? Jenks24 (talk) 08:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Between Nick-D and I we left messages on the talk pages of all the editors who created the articles asking them to point their lecturer towards our discussion; I don't think we got any replies. I haven't tried email - the few users I just checked didn't set email addresses. bou·le·var·dier (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Nice to know that you've tried to get in contact. Jenks24 (talk) 09:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I watchlisted the talk pages of the editors I contacted and there were no responses there either. I'd like to make contact with their lecturer to offer advice on how to avoid the problems with this project happening again, but this seems impossible unless she or he self-identifies. Nick-D (talk) 11:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.