Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AEC Digital Solutions LLC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 水 13:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

AEC Digital Solutions LLC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article, created by a editor whose username closely corresponds to the name of a person mentioned in the article as a senior staffer in the company (hence conflict of interest), about a company with no properly sourced or substantiated evidence of encyclopedic notability. All of the sourcing here is to primary sources like the company's own website, its own self-penned profile on public relations databases and its own press releases, with not a shred of reliable source coverage anywhere in the references — and while the writing tone is relatively neutral, given that the article doesn't even really make a claim to passing WP:CORP it still ultimately functions as a promotional advertisement for the company rather than a proper encyclopedia article about it. No prejudice against recreation in the future if it can be sourced properly, but companies aren't automatically entitled to keep articles on Wikipedia just because you can point to their own websites as proof that they exist. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 15:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article by editor User:Shiv.bhusan about a firm one of whose key people is listed as one Shiv Bhushan Singh. Aside from a couple of reprinted press releases I am finding nothing about this firm, and nothing that could meet WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 18:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clearly the case of non notability.   Mr RD     18:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above, non notable at all. Karlhard (talk) 00:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.