Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AERO97ONE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete (along with all 16 redirects to it). WjBscribe 04:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

AERO97ONE

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable and unsourced spam. &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 00:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I think even a small and probably unimaginative radio network is notable. As for the article, I removed the two-thirds of it which was pure advertising and unjustified detail.DGG 04:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as corporate vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 04:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. DGG's edits appear to have been undone (and the AfD tag removed, which I have replaced). A1octopus 17:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not worth the trouble and edit wars -Docg 00:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons I speedied it once already: no assertion of notability, no evidence of same, promotional in tone. Read: spam. Guy (Help!) 10:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.