Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFS top 100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. (CSD A2: Copy of an article from another Wikipedia - nl::AFS_top_100.)

AFS top 100

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The most obvious problem is that this is a straightforward copyright violation. But if even if we chose to ignore this, the fact would remain that this is not encyclopedic: it's one small group's opinion, a subjective classification that doesn't meet Wikipedia's needs for objective information. Pichpich (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 *  Delete . Unencyclopedic. It doesn't belong here, simple as that.--Michig (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note that this was also the basis for the book Greatest Ever Footballers, and the list and book were the subject of a few articles, generally ridiculing it -, , , - so maybe it verges on notability. Simply repeating the list here doesn't seem appropriate, however.--Michig (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Interesting oddity: the list currently in the article doesn't even correspond to the AFS list. I guess the good news is that it's not a copyright violation anymore, it's just a random list pretending to be a copyright violation! :-) Pichpich (talk) 17:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)