Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AF Compressors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

AF Compressors

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a company that reads like a press release. I originally PRODed this but it was decline because sources might exist basically. It's a direct translation of the French article made by the same account, which was a SPA who made these articles then left. References given are hard to verify, and no inline citations are used. The French article uses the same references. Magazine Entreprendre exists and was around at the date given so you could probably find the issue, but Druckluftteknik is just the (mispelled) German word for air compressor technology and Pack News doesn't return anything useful. I don't think this has enough reliable sources to meet WP:NCORP but if it existed since 1870 like it claims it might have some coverage so I'll be happy to withdraw this if enough reliable sourcing is found. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  19:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing NCORP. I analyzed anew and reached the same conclusions as nom. The text is bad but not bad enough for TNT. Hence, just like the nom, I researched notability and could find very few sources for a company that claims to be world leaders in their field. All I found was niche and/or primary. gidonb (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete doesn't meet the basic criteria for General Notability Guidelines Old-AgedKid (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.