Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AG-490


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect may be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

AG-490

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable "pill". No claims to notability Nördic   Nightfury  10:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Nördic   Nightfury  10:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Janus kinase, with no issue with re-creating. Right now, it is little more than a definition, and as such should be deleted as per WP:NOTDIC. However, searches turned up quite a few in-depth sourcing on this inhibitor. The first page of a Google Books search alone shows its notability. If I had a lick of interest in this subject, or felt I was competent in writing about it, I would expand the article myself. If someone does expand it, with sourcing, please ping me.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect As per above, another stub from a creator who rarely finishes pages, point it somewhere until such time as a real article is made. JamesG5 (talk) 02:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redirect. Not enough content to warrant an article., but worth mentioning as a single sentence at Janus kinase. Kingofaces43 (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * In retrospect, the subject doesn't even have appropriate sources to include a single sentence, so I'm changing to delete. Kingofaces43 (talk) 14:01, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Tyrosine-kinase inhibitor - the drug's full name is Tyrphostin B42, and Tyrphostin already redirects to that article. Agricolae (talk) 21:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * To clarify, just a redirect, no content merged. Agricolae (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete there is not good enough sourcing to make this even DUE at the other article. Jytdog (talk) 16:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.