Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AGAST (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

AGAST
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

article does not indicate encyclopedic notability. Oo7565 (talk) 01:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability and lack of reliable independent sources. I'm utterly amazed that the last AfD for this was closed as keep, because neither the strength of numbers nor the strength of argument could have justified a closing admin to infer a consensus to keep. Reyk  YO!  03:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A sincere effort but the subject does not seem to be notable. Only sources are blog posts which don't even give much information. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - Opinion same as last AfD. Only source I can find is Adventuregamers, which I believe is reliable but alone doesn't support a whole article. I'll support the software's inclusion in a broader topic/"list of" article. Marasmusine (talk) 08:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.