Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AGF 2-0 Frem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. - Mailer Diablo 21:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Danish second division soccer match results


A very dangerous precedent to allow run of the mill soccer match results. -- RHaworth 13:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed that Wikipedia is not an appropriate forum for entire articles on individual soccer matches. At best the scores from these matches could be included in an article about the entire season. These matches are not notable enough to require an individual article. Gwernol 13:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 13:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Certain football matches deserve their own articles, such as FA Cup Finals, World Cup Finals, etc. Run-of-the-mill league games involving minor lower-league teams are a milion miles away from that category.  The articles also completely lack context.... ChrisTheDude 13:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not ESPN. – Elisson • T • C • 13:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Gwernol. Not notable. Akihabara 13:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 13:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - unless there was something notable about these matches, we don't need articles on them. Jayden54 14:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom SUBWAYguy 20:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - this is not a sports journalism service, if we start allowing reports of normal week in week out matches, then every match of every week in every division of every national league will merit an article. I don't even want to think about that happening. Robotforaday 01:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per policy and prior discussion. Creator also made Template:In and Template:Out, which will be orphaned when these articles go. Punkmorten 16:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Wikipedia is not a vidiprinter doktorb wordsdeeds 11:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.