Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AG Church Thuvayoor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

AG Church Thuvayoor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

if debate continues it will be a massive problem because of administration Wellwisherobliged (talk) 14:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: The original nominator (User:Wellwisherobliged) left a restore request at WP:REFUND in this section, meaning that they have asked to have the nomination withdrawn. However since there are two "delete" rationales here that argue that the church has a lack of notability, I'm going to leave this AfD nomination open to run its full course via AfD. I'm also concerned over the claims that the Wikipedia entry has a new "administrator" and I'd like to make sure that User:Abinpbiju and User:Wellwisherobliged are aware that neither of them are considered to be administrators on Wikipedia and that as neither of them have WP:OWNERSHIP of the page, they will have to show that the church has notability via reliable sources (WP:RS) if they want the page to remain on Wikipedia. We cannot keep an entry on a church just because it is considered to be sacred- you have to establish notability via reliable sources that are independent of the church itself and go into depth about it. Routine notifications of events, database entries (WP:TRIVIAL), or anything released by the church or its people (WP:PRIMARY) would not be considered a reliable source that would establish notability. However at the same time, coverage does not need to be in English and can be in Hindi, as this church is located in India. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete While the nominator's reason is not a valid deletion reason, the church in question clearly fails notability guidelines. Safiel (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Clear delete for no assertion of notability. This should have been speedied; now we have to waste everyone's time with a snowball AfD. —Swpbtalk•contribs 18:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment No need for deletion further — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abinpbiju (talk • contribs) 03:58, 2 September 2014
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as unreferenced. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete -- All we have is a list of NN pastors (NN as none have articles) of a church with 82 members. That is clearly a NN church.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:30, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.