Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AHM Air


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Creator and sole contributor (apart from AfD tagging) has requested deletion (see note at bottom). No objection to re-creation once notability is established TravellingCari  21:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

AHM Air

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears non-notable. An "airline" with a single on-demand leased Cessna 172, connected to a magazine with an article that was deleted. The article even states "not founded" in the infobox. The website is just an under construction page at a free hosting provider. Hawaiian717 (talk) 00:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - wow, an airline operating one four-seater prop plane that they don't own and haven't received yet. They have not conducted any flights on the plane they haven't got. Their website does not yet exist, and they don't plan to do anything for at least another five months. No mentions in independent sources. I'm going to venture that this fails WP:ORG. ~ mazca  t 00:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't delete - If you were the owner of the company and you were told the company was not notable. Well, look at some other articles about Canadian airlines like this airline: White River Air, no references, half the size of AHM Air does not show the destinations and barely any text, its not being deleted! Why is this article? Whenaxis (talk) 12:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What about X? falls under arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Non-notable articles are found out and removed in due course. AHM Air should stand or fall on its own merits. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Question to author: What published source is this article's information coming from? • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * AHeM Feel free to nominate the article White River Air if you wish to do so. Mandsford (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: A very non-notable airline. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. More important, this airline fails WP:Verifiability without sources. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - THis might be a hoax. 2 crew members? &mdash; Ceran  thor  [Formerly LordSunday] 14:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable, probably a hoax. Why would a Canadian operator use an american registered Cessna on public transport duties, also N3602 is not a Cessna 172. MilborneOne (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note - To adminstrators or whoever this may concern, I am the creator/author of AHM Air in good faith, I want AHM Air to be deleted for now, but when AHM Air and or Atlantic Hurricane Magazine become notable enough, I, Whenaxis must be able to recreate one or both of these articles. Whenaxis (talk) 20:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.