Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AHZ Associates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

AHZ Associates

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

completely and utterly non notable vanity spam by an SPA. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The article reads like an advert, and is currently supported by citations to rehashed corporate announcements. I've looked for better sourcing, but didn't find anything that would come closing to meeting the requirements at WP:NCORP. Girth Summit  (blether)  13:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Not to mention that the sourcing is literally almost entirely fake - it's blatant blackhat SEO and should be apparent to anyone with common sense. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious covert advertising - the sources are far from being reliable and independent as Girth Summit said above. I note that a G11 has been declined; I'd probably have deleted as G11, but now that it's been declined and an AfD is underway I shall let it play out. firefly  ( t · c ) 14:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, poor sourcing which is likely pay-to-publish and a promotional tone. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with all above. Oaktree b (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * They have a lot of authentic and famous sources of news and websites. So I think it's not fake page. Istiaqseo (talk) 11:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Considering you're paid to write this and you've still failed to disclose as much, of course you wouldn't think it's a "fake page". PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete None of the sourcing meets NCORP criteria for establishing notability, complete spam. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. Also misleading - stating that the company "represents" UK institutions implies that this company provides an official function on behalf of these institutions which is not true.  HighKing++ 15:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Firefly. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 08:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.