Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AH MY EYES THERE'S A JAVELIN IN ONE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:39, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

AH MY EYES THERE'S A JAVELIN IN ONE
None notable webcomic, has been around for less than a month, artist has no prior fame. A google search for the artists name "Vincenze Ravina" does reveal 100 links, but they are almost all to do with some guy who sells magic tricks, and not to a webcomic. - Hahnchen 16:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. nn. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 17:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as non-notable. Carioca 21:24, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:COMIC and WP:WEB on all counts (as far as I can determine). No Alexa rating. If kept, move to a title without all caps. Saberwyn 22:09, 1 November 2005 (UTC) Saberwyn 22:08, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It doesn't need to satisfy those proposals, because they are not guidelines. As such they should not be used to justify a vote for deletion. You may as well write "because I feel like deleting it" as your reason. --John Lynch 00:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete nn -- NS LE  ( Commu nicate! ) < Contribs > 09:57, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notability isn't a criteria in the official Wikipedia guidelines. I follow those guidelines when creating articles, so because this article meets those guidelines, it should be allowed to be kept.--John Lynch 00:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Um, WP:N would suggest otherwise. Unless you're using an absurdly strict definition of guidelines, in which case I'd image you'd expect such articles to get deleted quite often because (most?) others have a different definition. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 00:15, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * From the page There is currently no official policy on notability. I don't think "official policy" is to strict a definition.--John Lynch 03:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete nn. Dragonfiend 02:38, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * References to official policy are odious. Policy is just congealed consensus, and consensus is what we get by debating. The clear consensus around here is that something created a month ago, that certainly almost no one in the world has ever heard about, does not belong in the encyclopedia and should be Deleted post haste. --DavidConrad 07:30, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.