Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 16:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

 * – ( View AfD View log )

We have an article on each of these diseases. This appears to be a co-tract. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Yes exactly. Permutation articles like this are a scourge... nuke it before it multiplies. Shadowjams (talk) 22:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Classic WP:Content forking; nothing for which an article does not already exist.Novangelis (talk) 02:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essay. JFW &#124; T@lk  20:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - reasons for deletion nomination are not valid. This is clearly an article documenting the controversy between the global burden of diseases as outlined by WHOGlobal Burden of Disease and the actual priority diseases in global health programs. (Global Fund,Gates)These three diseases serve this function together and not as individual diseases so individual disease pages are not adequate. Author is presenting and citing extant controversy that some may want to censor through deletion. Author takes neutral stance to controversy. Reasons for deletion not substantiated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdwbream (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Covers three separate topics which already have existing articles. The content of this article does not make the case that the three topics converge in some notable way that might warrant a fourth separate article.  ChemNerd (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.