Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIS Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 22:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

AIS Time

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable term, sourced to only one TV show. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 20:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Standard issue non-notable neologism. Hairhorn (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

So, how many TV shows must an article be sourced to before it's allowed to stay? Does the Wiki community always hate on new contributions? --Chris.kuebler (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * How many TV shows? Er.... more than one? Try Googling for "AIS time" and get back to me. Hairhorn (talk) 23:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment the term has uses other than the TV reference used in the article: Its a term used for writers when "Ass in seat" time is important to actually producing . "Ass in seat" is also used as a term for headcounts at entertainment venues . The term seems to have wider use than expected from the context of the article . MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Then there's still the issue of the article is a definition. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced neologism. Furthermore the page currently consists of a definition and a de-facto "In popular culture" section (the description of the television episode), neither of which is appropriate as the sole content of an article. (I suppose one could argue that the combination of the two is sufficient; I disagree.) Note, too, that the references suggested by MichaelQSchmidt are uses of the term ass-in-seat, not uses or descriptions of AIS time. Cnilep (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.