Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AI and ENVIRONMENT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:37, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

AI and ENVIRONMENT

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is lacking content to ascertain the notability criteria. Abishe (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fundamentally, this is original research like an essay in list form. It's an effort to take a handful of AI or robotics events with some vague connection to environmental science and present them as a coherent timeline. Regardless of whether there's some notable core concept here or not, this isn't the way to approach it. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this appears to by WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Wm335td (talk) 20:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to not delete anytime soon; the deletion notice should be given time to encourage the authors, and others, to improve the page; my view is that it serves as a shell for an important topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbpark2 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – WP:NUKEIT. The topic appears notable, but the article must be entirely rewritten – as prose – utilizing sources describing the relationship between AI and the environment. In its current state, the article is a list of scattered events that does not indicate why these events are especially notable or should be included together in a list; it almost exemplifies WP:NOTDIR as listings without context. This is also not the correct title because of its capitalization, so even if the article is not deleted, at least this title should be. ComplexRational (talk) 01:42, 14 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.