Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AK-50


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 19:49, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

AK-50

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks significant coverage in reliable (i.e. not self-published) independent (i.e. not interviews) secondary sources. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete prototype gun that fails WP:BASIC. Mztourist (talk) 03:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom a prototype gun that fails GNG. Rickshaw Takahashi (talk) 05:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Article reads like a promotional blurb; subject fails GNG.TH1980 (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete not based enough — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1c0:c802:d4f0:ad0e:a1a3:8fa8:8586 (talk) 07:18, August 3, 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Page appears to have been recently vandalised, but even before then it didn't seem notable in its field. RomanSpa (talk) 10:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The coverage exists but is too niche/unreliable to meet GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.