Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALICEWEB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈  10:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

ALICEWEB

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable website failing WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are hundreds of independent sources that make at least some reference to this Brazilian government database that can be obtained by WP:GOOGLETESTing.  For instance,, ,,,.  By its nature, it's unlikely to have many sources where ALICEWEB is the primary discussion subject. Fiachra10003 (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  01:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  01:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Good short article defining an economics data source. Sensible for Wikipedia to define it. It would appear in an economics encyclopedia, therefore include in Wikipedia. Useful link from studies using its data.  do  ncr  am  03:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are hundreds of Google Books hits and thousands of Google Scholar hits citing this government service as a source of data. Chris vLS (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a government database so sources are mostly going to be citing ALICEWEB without direct coverage of the topic. Elaenia (talk) 05:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.