Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMAX Information Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

AMAX Information Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * (AMAX Engineering: )
 * (AMAX Engineering: )

A decade of adding Press Releases to an article. When the press releases are removed, no actual sourcing remains. Please check history for article before Press releases were removed. A WP:BEFORE doesn't show any significant coverage in books or papers nor news. Fails WP:NCORP Slywriter (talk) 22:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Slywriter (talk) 22:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article refers to this firm as AMAX Engineering Corporation which should possibly be its title? It presumably landed under the present title to distinguish from the defunct Australian company Amax Engineering and the AMAX radio standard. I have added a second Findsources above for the name in the article. AllyD (talk) 07:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a company therefore NCORP guidelines apply. I agree with nom, I'm unable to locate any sources to meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 20:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks sources fails fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: A company whose product range focus has pivoted through the years from 1979 onwards; various product reviews in PC Mag can be seen in Google Books, various industry awards were listed in earlier versions of this article, but these do not appear significant in themselves; no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 16:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.