Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMP Broadcasting Network, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete as a hoax. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

AMP Broadcasting Network, Inc.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Hoax article. This TV network does not exists. -Danngarcia (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, hoax. Only Google hit of substance is a really fake-looking website on a free web host.  Author's only other contribution was DWYG, a similar hoax article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Starblind is right. The site referred is fake indeed.  Manila, where the subject is supposed to be based, does not have Channel 6 and Channel 10, as well as the so-called radio stations listed.  I'm so scared of clicking the ads as well. Starczamora (talk) 21:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * In addition to "Channels 6 and 10", "87.7" (the supposed radio frequency of its supposed FM radio station) is an FM frequency that can be reused for local applications (at least, here in the Philippines); it's the frequency that my home parish uses to broadcast prayers from our parish convent every procession. Most likely, it is a fake. I'm voting a speedy delete on this one, as it's likely a hoax. --- Tito Pao (talk) 07:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Why do you want this article be deleted? We are only low power trust me! Don't delete this...it's our only way to be known by others. We really plan to upgrade our stations to broadcast in a more powerful signal so nobody can get suspicious when it gets into the internet! Please trust me!! If you won't believe me, okay go ahead! delete it! I'm not here to just bother you guys..I jst want our network to be listed in the wikipedia record even it is so small..trust me please i beg you..GOD KNOWS WHAT'S THE TRUTH!! Have conscience! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.184.50 (talk) 11:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Because, for God's sake, what you (or the other (co-)creators of this article) wrote in doesn't hold.
 * To begin with, I can't find any such information (say, about an application to operate) at the National Telecommunications Commission website. TV channels can't just be created by will or claim that you (or your so-called company) owns the bandwidth for Channel 6 and 10, which don't exist...you need a franchise from both Houses of Congress, because only Congress can grant you permission to set up a TV station; specifically, there should be a Republic Act passed by both the House of Representatives and the Philippine Senate that says by virtue of the Philippine Constitution you are given permission to operate and broadcast a television and/or radio station. For you to claim that you are operating one such TV station but without the proper permits means that perhaps someone should be reporting you to the NTC so that you can be investigated for possible violation of telecommunications laws :P
 * 87.7 FM is also one of the frequencies that is being recycled by RJ Jacinto's "wireless guitar" (which he often demonstrates on his informercials on RJ29, in case you haven't been looking), which makes your claim that your so-called company owns the bandwidth spurious; at best, you must be using an ultra-low transmitter that won't go further than your local barangay. Also, isn't 106 FM already allocated to TV5 (the former ABC5) and, incidentally, 107.1 FM in an Ormoc City radio station, as seen here and here contrary to what is written here in your self-published "source"? (And, oh, by the way, I didn't know that Blizzard Entertainment gave you permission to come up with an unauthorized/bootleg compilation of the Warcraft OST, as seen in this page. "God knows the truth" my foot...tell that to the marines.) --- Tito Pao (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Why are you guys so selfish? Actually i'm just an ordinary 14 year-old high school student wishing to own such a network. PLEASE GIVE ME SOME CONSIDERATION!!!! Don't delete this article pls. Hindi naman masamang mangarap ah. Gustong gusto ko talaga magkaroon ng radio & TV network..bakit hindi niyo ba maintindihan? lagi na lang hinaharangan lahat ng pangarap ko...pilit nila sa akin nurse...ayaw ko naman nun..anu mapapala mo na dun? Sorry if i spoken it in tagalog because hindi ko na talaga matiis na sabihin sa inyo lahat ng nararamdaman ko...NAPAKADAMOT NIYO! sa totoo lng...minsan lang mangarap. Alam niyo pasalamat kayo may mga taong may gusto pang mag-ambisyon ng katulad ng sa akin! hindi tulad ng ibang bata diyan...walang ambisyon sa buhay.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.223.71 (talk) 23:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Because, damn it, Wikipedia is not the place where you can fulfill your midday fantasies. This is a repository of verifiable and unbiased facts. The mere fact that none of what was on this article exists means that it shouldn't be here in the Wikipedia in the first place. (And please do yourself a favor by reading the policy and guideline pages I included in my comments' links). Mag-aral kang mabuti, pondohan mo muna yung pangarap mo, tapos saka mo uli gawin yung article mo pag talagang nmeron ka nang totoong network at radio station. Tinagalog ko na yan, sana naman naiintindihan mo na yan. (Study hard, earn money for your dreams and then come back here when you really, really have your own network. I wrote that in Tagalog, I hope you would get it this time.) --- Tito Pao (talk) 03:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Please explain why this was relisted? The explanation by the anon above proves this should be speedy deleted as a hoax. Speedy delete, move on. Corvus cornix talk  03:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It still can be speedy closed and deleted but you're right, I probably shouldn't have relisted it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Ledred.png|20px]] Speedy Delete per G3, blatant hoax. RockManQ (talk) 04:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.