Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMi Exploration Program


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

AMi Exploration Program

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lacks all notability so far. Sources are not independent, looking for better sources only produces pr pieces, articles reads more like a sales pitch for the cryptocurrency "tokens". Fram (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology,  and Romania. Fram (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No hits on scholar and incorrect hits on books. The only news source is a PR release, and just promotional stuff on Google. Fails WP:GNG for a lack of independent, reliable sourcing.  &ddagger; Night Watch &omega;     (talk)   13:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete "What is AMI?" This isn't a sales brochure. AMI is deleted. Non-notable and no sources found. Even the press-releases used are too flowery. Oaktree b (talk) 14:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I was going to say Merge to ARCAspace, but the relevant content is already there. Would not be surprised if this becomes notable in the future though. W 42  14:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete From what I can find, no significant coverage from secondary/independent sources. Uhai (talk) 09:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.