Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANCRA Marketing Model


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Missvain (talk) 00:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

ANCRA Marketing Model

 * – ( View AfD View log )

None of the sources mention the subject. An online search doesn't produce any reliable secondary sources for said model. Might be just a cover-up for backlinks provided in the references list, much of which is primary source-based. nearlyevil 665  19:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Scottwrites (talk) 23:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC) ok. well... the whole point was I found several sources for the model because I was using it. But when I came to wiki and didn't see an article I thought, ok, write one. Now as to the whole cover-up for backlinks in references; I'd never heard that before. But don't really care. Because if that's a concern, if you want I'll just go find completely different sources and change every single one of them. That seems kind of odd given they talk about the steps, but whatever. If that's ok, great. If not, say so and I won't go to the trouble. Not important enough to debate much.
 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Logs:


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.