Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANN4HO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

ANN4HO

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a musician, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passage of WP:NMUSIC. As always, musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's possible to verify that they exist: the notability test is the reception of media coverage which verifies that they've accomplished something that would pass a notability criterion in WP:NMUSIC — but the notability claim on offer here is that she exists as a musician, and the references are entirely to primary source content on the self-published event calendars of venues (entirely in her own hometown) where she's performed, with absolutely no evidence of reliable source coverage about her in real media to verify that she's accomplished anything that would get her into an encyclopedia. Also, this was moved from draftspace by its own creator, without any evidence that it was ever actually submitted for a proper WP:AFC review, but the state of the article doesn't suggest a compelling reason to just move it back into draftspace for improvement. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete a very start of her career musician who is no where near being notable at present. She may get there at some point, but clearly not yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - this has been moved to draft space inappropriately. I have requested that this move be reverted. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've moved it back. Bearcat (talk) 20:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom.-- Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 23:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.