Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANSYS, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. no arguments for deletion aside from nom JForget  22:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

ANSYS, Inc
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This page does not show notability, and has no references. It seems like it is nothing besides an advert for the company. Tootitnbootit (talk) 17:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * note the following article - Articles for deletion/Fluent, Inc. a product of Ansys - is also up for deletion and should be combined discussion, but I am not sure how to do that. Active Banana (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note also that the article itself is actually ANSYS, Inc. (with a period) the links above are just to the redirect. Active Banana (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete? I vote no.  If you have a question on citations then the external link is available.  ANSYS is a fortune 1000 company that is a major cog in both the regional and national economies.  Not sure how this would be a legitimate candidate for deletion, I better check Walt Disney Company, General Electric and Simon Property Group now before they too are also deemed unencylopedic.  Hholt01 (talk) 05:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm not sure why this article is being targeted. As with many articles on mid-sized companies, most of the info that's available is the basics: the type of stuff that comes from a business magazine or a company website. While it needs improved, this goes for a massive number of articles.Mr. Vitale (talk) 08:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hint on why the nomination: targeted deletion probably from a competitor of those companies. Canonebeseriouz (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep multiple possible sources can be found by the above search links to establish notability. --Karnesky (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Just needs to be rewritten. The company is notable from searches.Lonedrops (talk) 23:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: article needs to be improved, but topic meets WP:ORG.  Dewritech 06:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dewritech (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.