Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AQuantive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

AQuantive

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete not WP:NOTABLE LES 953 (talk) 02:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Eastmain (talk • contribs)  03:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. If a company is sold for $US 6 billion, then it is probably notable. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep 3 reliable independent sources added. LES 953 (talk) 05:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 08:11, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per the newly added sources and WP:ORG the company is sufficiently notable. Marokwitz (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * keep Anything that Microsoft paid $6,000,000,000 for has got to be wp:notable. North8000 (talk) 11:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable. Joe Chill (talk) 21:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.