Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARC Fertility


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America1000 01:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

ARC Fertility

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My extensive PROD was removed and this should never have been accepted from AfC to begin with because none of this actually contains substance and I found suggesting otherwise, therefore this so certainly this an advertisement. SwisterTwister  talk  20:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 08:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 08:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 08:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * note - Nominating an article for deletion based on a good faith belief that there are not enough reliable sources to show notability is fine, but claiming without evidence that "therefore this so certainly this an advertisement" is a gross breach of that good faith. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 08:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Reads like a promotion, created by an SPA ... there's AGF and then there "in the face of observable evidence" - David Gerard (talk) 10:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * And then there's actually discussing what matters: if this company has significant coverage in independent reliable sources. And it does not.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 10:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - promotional article, bad sourcing, a basic WP:BEFORE turns up extensive press releases and occasional passing mentions in RSes - David Gerard (talk) 10:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - when searching sources, this is the Californian one - there's also an ARC Fertility in Chennai - David Gerard (talk) 10:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - standard searches not finding enough independent significant coverage in reliable sources.  In this case, the company founder David Adamson may be more notable then the company.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 10:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * delete - fails GNG; just promo. Jytdog (talk) 17:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: "this an advertisement" is exactly right. Nothing else there. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete How was this ever accepted at AFC? There is no significant coverage to pass WP:CORPDEPTH here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm also amazed that despite the glaring COI issue, it was never clarified. AFC reviewers are supposed to clarify this first. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.