Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARM Cortex-A73


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ARM architecture. And possibly merge what can be sourced from history.  Sandstein  07:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

ARM Cortex-A73

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spammy article without any third-party sources. If there were any independently-sourced content worthy of merging, ARM architecture would be an appropriate target, but there isn't. Artem-S-Tashkinov also tried to nominate the page for deletion but didn't know how to complete the process. Huon (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak merge to ARM architecture: I found that source, though it has the stench of a copy-pasted press report; it supports the article's assertions. Since the chip is certainly not (yet?) notable for a standalone article, we can merge it. Of course, it all depends on a single not-so-great source, so... Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.