Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASG-Cypress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

ASG-Cypress

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NPRODUCT, I could not find any sources for notability. (Plus, the page is a mess) Tigraan (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Using wikipedia as a platform for advertising. Daniel kenneth (talk[&section=new + ]·[ tag]·contribs ·deleted contribs ·[ logs]·[ filter log] ·block user ·[ block log]·SUL·CA·[ checkuser] ([ log])) 15:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, spamming . – Be..anyone &#x1F4A9;  17:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G11 as the article is "exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." It looks like it fails NPRODUCT and GNG as well.  Rebb  ing   19:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment by nominator: there is a comment on the article's talk page, as well as on my user talk page. Both are by, the page creator, and neither seem convincing to me. I copy the second one below for the sake of fairness.
 * This article is being based on a web search for Virtual Printers. The product ASG-Cypress is a precursor of Virtual Printers concept. It has millions of users and thousand companies around the world. In Brazil, for example, the most extensive payroll of the Country passes through ASG-Cypress. The article will have more research and more updates on next weeks. It would be great if you don't delete this article. Lasherbr (talk) 10:15, 13 April 2016 (BRT)
 * Tigraan (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Mantain: I can safely say or change the article to apply G11. I had contributed with some fixes on wikipedia pages for a long time. However, this is my first article and I humbly apologize if its poorly implemented. Please, I ask you to consider it, since its pretty important software in industry history. It has more than 20 years of existance. Lasherbr (talk) 14:53, 14 April 2016 (BRT)
 * Please read the Wikipedia guidelines on notability, in particular WP:PRODUCT; it is quite a different thing to be notable and to be "important". "Notable" is a (relatively) objective standard based on coverage (basically press mentions). Tigraan Click here to contact me 08:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.