Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASIQUAL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 22:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

ASIQUAL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wholly advertismal, reads like a press release and plenty of time has been given to fix it. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NORG. I was not able to find independent, reliable sources that documented the subject in-depth. The only sources I could find were very brief and almost entirely promotional. -- Biblio worm  23:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and I'm not seeing any possible mention elsewhere unless someone thinks it can - My searches found nothing good aside from some non-English links here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent, reliable sourcing to demonstrate notability, to be found or provided. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.