Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASM Stadium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Thame United F.C.. (non-admin closure)  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

ASM Stadium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about the home ground of a football club that plays at the ninth level of football and which has never hosted football higher than level eight (the generally accepted cut-off point in English football is level 5, the lowest national level). Article created by the same editor who has created seevral articles on players for the club despite them not being notable (see these AfDs, one of which he ignored and recreated the article shortly after it had closed). Unsurprisingly it was said editor who also removed the prod without a rationale. I think the possibility of a topic ban may also require consideration if the community's time is going to be continued to be wasted in this way. Number  5  7  18:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Thame United F.C., the home club. GiantSnowman 19:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per GiantSnowman. It's a plausible search term, and the team is notable (the cutoff for teams is Level 10, not Level 5), but it's not notable in its own right. Smartyllama (talk) 19:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect - a plausible search term and I would expect a brief section on the stadium in the club article. The deletion rationale is flawed however, there is no consensus for cut off for ground notability, nor should there be as this is already governed by WP:GEOFEAT, a guideline which this stadium fails. Fenix down (talk) 08:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per GiantSnowman Chetsford (talk) 19:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect – per above. A valid search term I believe but not appropriate as a stand alone article. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 01:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.