Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASU Undie Run


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

ASU Undie Run

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local university thing, not for WP. Fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  17:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep -- "Local university thing" is a hitherto unheard-of criterion for deletion but, regardless, it must yield to the GNG. And this subject passes it easily.  It's got sufficient national and regional coverage.  Just see  and .  And maybe in the future nom will stick to already discovered criteria for deletion. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. We have almost always deleted articles on events such as these, using a relatively strict interpretation of the necessary sourcing. the sourcinghere is jsut that: the Huff Post is unreliable for notability, not bering underconsistent editorial control.  Local newspapers alwaysreport colelge events, and are therefore indisriminate. DGG ( talk ) 02:10, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable, as all sources on the article appear to be primary, Huffington Post isn't necessarily a proper source, and New Times source is hyper-local. SportingFlyer  talk  22:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete- not notable, poor sourcing as mentioned above.--Rusf10 (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.