Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AT&T Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

AT&T Canada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertisement for a subsidiary company of AT&T. Partly copyvio of this page The Banner talk 13:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Comment I have deleted the copied section and will look at what has been left. Thincat (talk) 07:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment After removing more copied material (some attributed, some not), I have not found close copying in the reduced article. Most of the corporate puffery is gone but I can't make much sense of what remains. I don't know whether it is deletable and I don't have the energy to try and improve it. Thincat (talk) 08:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC)




 * Weak keep Very likely to be notable, though the article content is neither comprehensive nor particularly informative. This might be a candidate for a merge/redirect somewhere, but I don't know where. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 11:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I remember when Unitel was formed and what it meant to Canada as an early challenge to the Canadian regional phone monopolies. A Google News archive search reveals many feature articles. This a rather snowy keep imo, whatever the problems with the article now. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.