Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AT&T Pogo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn Shii (tock) 20:23, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

AT&T Pogo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Vaporware, sources are dead links Shii (tock) 05:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 07:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge Don't know what the heck you're talking about, only the homepage is dead; all the CNet etc. links are live. --Cyber cobra (talk) 08:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 08:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Well-sourced, meets notability guidelines. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 09:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see a reason why this isn't notable, and as cyber said, most all of the links are still live. Tarheel95 (talk)
 * Keep. Although the project never made it past beta, there are sufficient independent references, which even work. (It's also interesting, although that in itself is not reason to keep it.) Vaporware, however, is not a valid criterion for deletion, never mind that's a subjective label; see the AfDs for Windows Neptune and similar software. Pcap ping  15:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.