Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATRC

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 15:09, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

ATRC
Fancruft.&mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 01:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: What is it?  The article doesn't say.  Pretty much nonsense at this point.  Verification?  Well, since we don't know what it is, we can't really confirm it.  Significant as a topic?  Seems like it's all about the whacky sense of humor of something called Link 80.  Is anyone/anything outside of that context going to know to look for this?  Well, "many" have joined it.  Who?  What? What is it? Delete to solve these agonies. Geogre 02:54, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently, from some extremely nonsensical google results, it's some in-joke of Link 80. Completely non-notable fancruft indeed. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 03:56, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable cruft. JamesBurns 07:46, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable. &mdash; mark &#9998; 10:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge if anyone knows what it's about. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 10:51, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: http://atrcrew.com/ &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 17:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, saw this the other day & figured I'd see if anyone nominated it. StopTheFiling 22:04, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge with Link 80. (One of the links to this article is for a nuclear reactor in Idaho: List of nuclear reactors. Probably not what was intended.) Pburka 00:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .